FreeIndia.Org FreeIndia.Org FreeIndia.Org FreeIndia.Org
Home Book Talk Recommendations Bibliography Astrology HinduShops Gifts to India
Books By Subjects
Introduction And References
Temples And Legends of India
Hindu Scriptures
Stories
History
Social And Contemporary Issue
Dharma And Philosophy
Art
Worship
Philosophy And Commentaries
Hindutva
Organizations
Featured Book Authors
David Frawley
Dr. A. V. Srinivasan
Raja Gopala Chari
Dr. Krishna Bhatta
Advertisements
Chintan
Dr. David Frawley
Prof. Lata Jagtiani
Dr. Krishna Bhatta
Su.Sh Aditi Banerjee
Sh. Santhana Gopal
Dr. A.V. Srinivasan
Dr. Satish Modh
Dr. Raja Roy
Dr. Nachiketa Tiwari
Sh. Ed. Vishwanathan
Prof. Subhash Kak
Prof. Romesh Diwan
Dr. N. S. Rajaram
Vinay Sahasrabuddhe
Sh. Sudhir Birodkar
Sh. Devant Maharaj
Bookstore
Today's Best Selling Hindu Books from Amazon.com
Best Selling Yoga Books
Books about Gurus
Jain Books
Sikh Books
Eastern Religions Best Sellers
Books in the News
Special Sections
Biographies
Temples And Legends of India
Culture Course
Advertisements
HinduNet Signature Merchandise
35. On Account Of The Inferential Sign Further On ....





Hindu Books > Hindu Scriptures > The Vedanta - Sutras > Adhyaya I > Pada III > 35. On Account Of The Inferential Sign Further On ....

Page1

35. On account of the inferential sign further on, together with Kaitraratha.

The kshattriya-hood of Ganasruti is further to be accepted on account of the Kshattriya Abhipratarin Kaitraratha, who is mentioned further on in this very same Samvargavidya which Raikva imparts to Ganasruti.--But why?--As follows. The section beginning 'Once a Brahmakarin begged of Saunaka Kapeya and Abhipratarin Kakshaseni while being waited on at their meal,' and ending 'thus do we, O Brahmakarin, meditate on that being,' shows Kapeya, Abhipratarin, and the Brahmakarin to be connected with the Samvarga-vidya. Now Abhipratarin is a Kshattriya, the other two are Brahmanas. This shows that there are connected with the vidya, Brahmanas, and from among non-Brahmanas, a Kshattriya only, but not a Sudra. It therefore appears appropriate to infer that the person, other than the Brahmana Raikva, who is likewise connected with this vidya, viz. Ganasruti, is likewise a Kshattriya, not a Sudra.--But how do we know that Abhipratarin is a Kaitraratha and a Kshattriya? Neither of these circumstances is stated in the legend in the Samvarga-vidya! To this question the Sutra replies, 'on account of the inferential mark.' From the inferential mark that Saunaka Kapeya and Abhipratarin Kakshaseni are said to have been sitting together at a meal we understand that there is some connexion between Abhipratarin and the Kapeyas. Now another scriptural passage runs as follows: 'The Kapeyas made Kaitraratha perform that sacrifice' (Tand Bra. XX, 12, 5), and this shows that one connected with the Kapeyas was a Kaitraratha; and a further text shows that a Kaitraratha is a Kshattriya. 'from him there was descended a Kaitraratha who was a prince.' All this favours the inference that Abhipratarin was a Kaitraratha and a Kshattriya.

So far the Sutras have shown that there is no inferential mark to prove what is contradicted by reasoning, viz. the qualification of the Sudras. The next Sutra declares that the non-qualification of the Sudra proved by reasoning is confirmed by Scripture and Smriti.









Copyright © by Hindu Books Universe All Right Reserved.

Published on: 2003-07-09 (1141 reads)

[ Go Back ]
35. On Account Of The Inferential Sign Further On ....
Page1
Advertisement


This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2014, Dharma Universe.