|
Page1
4. And on account of there being no statement of its being an object of knowledge.
If the text meant the Non-evolved as understood by the Sankhyas it would refer to it as something to be known; for the Sankhyas, who hold the theory of Release resulting from the discriminative knowledge of the Evolved, the non-evolved, and the soul, admit that all these are objects of knowledge. Now our text does not refer to the Un-evolved as an object of knowledge, and it cannot therefore be the Pradhana assumed by the Sankhyas.
|
