FreeIndia.Org FreeIndia.Org FreeIndia.Org FreeIndia.Org
Home Book Talk Recommendations Bibliography Astrology HinduShops Gifts to India
Books By Subjects
Introduction And References
Temples And Legends of India
Hindu Scriptures
Stories
History
Social And Contemporary Issue
Dharma And Philosophy
Art
Worship
Philosophy And Commentaries
Hindutva
Organizations
Featured Book Authors
David Frawley
Dr. A. V. Srinivasan
Raja Gopala Chari
Dr. Krishna Bhatta
Advertisements
Chintan
Dr. David Frawley
Prof. Lata Jagtiani
Dr. Krishna Bhatta
Su.Sh Aditi Banerjee
Sh. Santhana Gopal
Dr. A.V. Srinivasan
Dr. Satish Modh
Dr. Raja Roy
Dr. Nachiketa Tiwari
Sh. Ed. Vishwanathan
Prof. Subhash Kak
Prof. Romesh Diwan
Dr. N. S. Rajaram
Vinay Sahasrabuddhe
Sh. Sudhir Birodkar
Sh. Devant Maharaj
Bookstore
Today's Best Selling Hindu Books from Amazon.com
Best Selling Yoga Books
Books about Gurus
Jain Books
Sikh Books
Eastern Religions Best Sellers
Books in the News
Special Sections
Biographies
Temples And Legends of India
Culture Course
Advertisements
HinduNet Signature Merchandise
Proposition Of Behalf Of The Appellant




Page: 1/11


Hindu Books > Hindutva > Supreme Court Judgement On "Hindutva" An Important Land Mark > Proposition Of Behalf Of The Appellant

Page1

The purport of the speeches was that for all serious problems of corruption, fissiparous tendencies, lack of patriotism among a few citizens, internal and external threat to the unity and integrity of the Nation referred to in the speeches, which have become a menace to the health of the Nation, the only solution in his opinion was Hinduism (Dharma or Sanatana Dharma), which happens to be the Culture evolved in this Country from most ancient times and which comprises within itself, the moral values in personal and public life, a deep sense of patriotism, respect for all religions, the preservation of which falls within the Fundamental right guaranteed under Article 29 of the Constitution, which constitutes no appeal to religion within the meaning of Section 123 (3) of the R. P. Act, 1951, and it does not create any enmity between any class of citizens on the basis of religion or language which alone is a corrupt practice under S. 123 (3A) of the R.P. Act.

Authors : Shri M. Rama Jois




Next Page (2/11) Next Page


Proposition Of Behalf Of The Appellant
Page1
Page2
Page3
Page4
Page5
Page6
Page7
Page8
Page9
Page10
Page11
Advertisement


This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2014, Dharma Universe.