|
Page1
As though the steady blood-letting of Hindusthan in dynastic relays by Muslims was not enough, their 1000-year-long atrocious rule in India was off and on punctuated by specialized horror- masters like Tamerlain, Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali. Veritable Islamic plagues, coming from beyond the holy Indus (Sindhu), raged across the fair land of Hindusthan in tempestuous fury. In their furious sweep leaving behind a trail of blood and tears, these Islamic monsters demonstrated to their co- religionists already infesting India as tyrants and traitors what Islamic brutality raging in cyclonic fury could achieve within a mere 15 months for which the ruling fanatic terror-tyrants took 15 years to complete.
One of these Islamic scourges, who descended on Hindusthan like a plague toward the close of the 14th century, was the congenital monster, Tamerlain alias Taimurlang alias Timur, the lame. It is from this brute of a Timur that the rapacious Moghuls, the last link in the Muslim dynastic relay that plagued India, descended on one side.
The weird dance of this Muslim devil on the stage of Hindusthan had its appropriate setting of a decade of utter confusion. Firozshah Tughlak, who has been fraudulently painted as a veritable angel, scholar, inventor, savior and what not, had died in 1388 A.D. His inventive genius may be gauged from his ingenious recipe of liberally mixing the fragments of the broken stone idols of the Hindu temple of Jwalamukhi in Nagarkot with the beef of freshly slaughtered temple cows and hanging this mixture in nosebags round the necks of Brahmins and forcing them to eat it.
Firoz's son Mohammed Tughlak II remained on the throne from 1390 to 1394 A.D. Throughout his reign brave Rajputs and Muslim fief holders challenged his authority. The disillusioned sultan in impotent rage ordered the wholesale massacre of thousands of Hindus whom his father had already reduced to serfdom. The deed justified his parentage. Logic defines man as a rational animal. But both Mohammed Tughlak II and his father Firozshah Tughlak lacked the rationality of a human being, never mind what the mentally handicapped historians of India say about them. To call sadists like Mohammed Tughlak II and his father as noble is intellectual perversion, and most Indian historians, bribed by the GoI, play the game.
Mohammed died in 1394 A.D. His son Humayun alias Sikandar succeeded him. He died in suspicious circumstances even before the end of 1394 A.D. He was succeeded by another Mohammed. Dissensions and revolts had now reached their peak. Bengal, Lahore, the rest of the Punjab, Gujarat, Malwa and other regions broke off from the Delhi sultanate and became independent. The matter became so ridiculous that at one point while Mohammed held court at Delhi, his cousin Nusrat Shah set up a sultanate of his own in another part of the same city of Delhi.
Author : Shri Purushottam Nagesh Oak
|
