61. Some (sages), versed in the law, considering the purpose of the appointment
not to have been attained by those two (on the birth of the first), think that a second
(son) may be lawfully procreated on (such) women.
62. But when the purpose of
the appointment to (cohabit with) the widow bas been attained in accordance with
the law, those two shall behave towards each other like a father and a daughter-in-law.
63. If those two (being thus) appointed deviate from the rule and act from
carnal desire, they will both become outcasts, (as men) who defile the bed of a
daughter-in-law or of a Guru.
64. By twice-born men a widow must not be
appointed to (cohabit with) any other (than her husband); for they who appoint
(her) to another (man), will violate the eternal law.
65. In the sacred texts which
refer to marriage the appointment (of widows) is nowhere mentioned, nor is the
re-marriage of widows prescribed in the rules concerning marriage.
66. This
practice which is reprehended by the learned of the twice-born castes as fit for
cattle is said (to have occurred) even among men, while Vena ruled.
67. That chief
of royal sages who formerly possessed the whole world, caused a confusion of the
castes (varna), his intellect being destroyed by lust.
68. Since that (time) the virtuous censure that (man) who in his folly appoints a
woman, whose husband died, to (bear) children (to another man).
69. If the
(future) husband of a maiden dies after troth verbally plighted, her brother-in-law
shall wed her according to the following rule.
70. Having, according to the rule,
espoused her (who must be) clad in white garments and be intent on purity, he
shall approach her once in each proper season until issue (be had).
|