This importance of initiation, which had been
developed by Apastamba’s time, bad probably caused the law-giver to
begin his treatise with it, as it formed the beginning of the
intellectual life of a man and we find Apastamba laying down strict
rules at length for such a student. It was a sin to look at a woman
and sacred texts could not be uttered when a Sudra woman looked at a
Brahmana.79
As the Dharma-Sutra of Apastamba formed a supplement
to the Grhya-Sutra, we do not find the details of -marriage as they
have been described in the Grhya Sastras. And, as woman’s sphere
became much restricted in society, the reference to women in the
general rules laid down for man is very few. Apastamba recognises six
kinds of marriages as legal ; the Brahma, Arsha, Daiva, Gandharva,
Asura and Rakshasa rites.80
Of these the first three alone the Brahma, Arsha and Daiva
marriages-are praiseworthy.81
He thus leaves out the Prajapatya and Paisacha kinds
of marriages. The quality of the offspring depended on the quality of
the marriage rite 82
but he lays certain restrictions, that a daughter shall not be given
in marriage to a man belonging to the same family (Gotra) 83
nor can marriage take place between relations within six degrees on
the mother’s or the father’s side. 84
We thus come to more restrictions on marriage.
Apastamba does not bar a woman from religious rites
nor does he allow a man to marry again without sufficient logical
grounds.‘ If he has a wife who is willing and able to perform her
share of the religious duties and who bears sons, he shall not take a
second. If a wife is deficient in one of these two qualities, he shall
take another, but before he kindles the fires of the Agnihotra. For a
wife who assists at the kindling of the fires becomes connected, with
whose religious rites of which that fire kindling: forms a part.’ 85