Thus Vaali, son of Indra, reproached Raama with his dying breath. And all this is
fully set out by Vaalmeeki, the divine poet, as well as by Kamban. Against this accusation
what defence could Raama offer? Vaalmeeki has it that Raama gave some explanation with
which Vaali was satisfied. But I am omitting all this as pointless and pray that the
learned may forgive me.
What I think is that an avataar is an
avataar and that among the sorrows that the Lord and His consort had to endure in their
earthly incarnation, this liability to have their actions weighed on the earthly scales is
a part. Vaali bruised and bleeding from the many wounds of his fight with Sugreeva,
lay in the throes of death.
He lived just long enough to see his queen
and his beloved son Angada-poor bewildered lad who at his mother's bidding 'to fall at the
feet of his father who was going on a long long journey' prostrated himself in silence,
too stunned to realise the extent of his loss. This will be narrated later. Vaali's words
were addressed to Raama. |