your judgement; it's a blot on 4Dharma Devatha
A clear case of partiality and an
instance of ignorance
When the accused shared the booty equally, claiming
Why dissimilar sentences to the same crime in your governance ?
The first, as admitted, is a teacher rich in mind, but perverted
The second, a
merchant ready to sell scruples like any article
The last, a seasoned burglar
past any power to be converted
Yet, all joined to empty the temple hundi sans
But you gave a mild reprimand to that teacher immoral
Ordered payment of a hige
sum by the merchant as penalty
And public fllogging to the buglar, I say it's abnormal
For each played his role equally well in that criminality.
are exactly right in your observation upto this point
Your imputation of
prejudice, or error to my verdict
Dear prince, is baseless and reflects a mind
out of joint
So listen with care and think well before you contradict.