Louis
Dumont has dealt with Jainism and Buddhism in his famous work. Homo
hierarchicus.13 Tracing the origins
of ahimsa and vegetarianism, he says both were originally confined
to the renouncer (that is a person who leaves social life to devote
himself to his salvation) and forced themselves on Hindu society
under the influence of Jainism and Buddhism, the two great
disciplines of salvation:
After all, how many kinds of
spiritual authority were there? Only two: the Brahman and his
tradition, the renouncer and his sects. How many factors of
initiative and invention? Only one, the renouncer faced with whom
the Brahman was such an effective factor of integration and
aggregation that in the long run he almost completely absorbed his
rivals. There was rivalry in public opinion between these two sorts
of spirituality, and this by itself can contribute to the
explanation of the efforts to go one better, the hardening of the
doctrines as, penetrating into the social world proper, they were
taken up by the Brahman on his own account. (Let us not forget that
the Kshatriyas have traditionally remained meat-eaters.) In short,
the Brahman would have adopted vegetarianism so as not to be outdone
by the renouncer qua spiritual leader.14
|