As
Sri Aurobindo wrote in his work Bankim-Tilak-Dayanand: "Bankim...
gave us the vision of our Mother... It is not till the motherland
reveals herself to the eye of the mind as something more than a
stretch of earth or a mass of individuals, it is not till she takes
shape as a great Divine and Maternal Power in a form of beauty that
can dominate the mind and seize the heart that these petty fears and
hopes vanish in an all-absorbing passion for our mother and her
service, and the patriotism that works miracles and saves doomed
nations is born."15
Bankim was not anti-Muslim. This
point has been clinched by Arabinda Poddar.16
In view of the importance of this question in a definition of Hindu
nationalism, it would be in order to discuss his findings at some
length. Anandmath, he says, "was definitely and
entirely an anti-British novel; the children of the Mother had
little to do with Muslims, even when they were depicted as fighting
against them." In the first edition of the novel, Bankim,
while describing the battle in the third section, does not use the
words yavan and nere (which implied Muslims), but
in their place the word ingrej (the British) was
consistently used. The substitution was clearly an afterthought
intended to protect Bankim from the wrath of the British.
|