Gandhiji
was conscious that the old order had been too badly disrupted to be
restored and that a new order had to be built, if India was again to
become a coherent entity. That was primarily why Nehru came to play
the critical role that he did in the country's life.
The difference between the Mahatma
and Nehru, it needs to be emphasized, were less significant than the
areas of agreement because Gandhiji accorded great importance to
Harijan upliftment and accommodation of Muslims in the
economic-political order on terms acceptable to them. Surely no one
can argue that any other Congress leader was better qualified to
attend to these concerns than Nehru. Nehru was Gandhiji's legitimate
ideological heir and his political status flowed from his
ideological closeness to the Mahatma.
It is perhaps not sufficiently known
that the Indian people have, since time immemorial, been preoccupied
with the problem of founding their polity on dharma. Aristotle noted
in his Politics on the testimony of a Greek historian (whose works
are no longer traceable) that India was the only land where virtue
was successfully made the basis of the political order. And the
Mahabharat lists 16 chakravartins (universal rulers) who exemplified
virtue. That doubtless ceased to be a reality long ago. But its
memory continues to possess the Indian people.
|