Mahatma
Gandhi could not have been thinking of Ram only as a member of the
Hindu pantheon when he talked of Ramrajya. He was looking for an
ideal concept for the reordering of India's public life when it
regained the freedom to engage in such an effort. In that search he
landed, inevitably on Ram, inevitably because no one else has ever
better embodied the essence of Hinduism in the public domain. Not
even Yudhishtira; for his pursuit of dharma, like those of his four
brothers, was one- dimensional uninformed as it was by a
simultaneous pursuit of kama and artha (pleasure and prosperity, in
a crude translation in the absence of exact equivalents).
Gandhiji's own life continued to be
inspired and, in fact, dominated, above all, by Ram. For him, as an
individual at the conscious level, politics remained an extension of
his religion, not in the narrow Semitic and the equally narrow
modern sense, but in the large Indian sense which admits literally
of millions of paths of self realization and of reaching God.
That is why Gandhiji sough
Hindu-Muslim amity on the platform of essential unity of the two religions
and Nehru on that of a common fight against feudalism,
exploitation and poverty. Both approaches failed to produce the
desired result; they had to fail. The two leaders tried to wish away
the unresolved and stalemated civilizational conflict and they could
not possibly succeed. The nobility of their purpose, the intensity
of their conviction and the Herculean nature of their effort could
not prevail against the logic of history. The alternative to
partition would have been infinitely worse.
|