I
would like to discuss here Sir Sayyid Ahmed Khan's role in the
modernization of Islam and therefore in checking the general retreat
of Islamic civilization. Sir Sayyid was greatly influenced by the
Naqshbandi order,Shah Waliullah (the eighteenth century reformer)
and Sayyid Ahmed Barelvi 19, the
Wahhabi leader who revived the principle and practice of hijra
(migration from dar-ul- harb,land of war or those lands not under
Muslim rule, where, under certain circumstances war can be
sanctioned against non-Muslims). Sir Sayyid saw the world as a
Muslim, as Professor Francis Robinson puts it.
This does not mean that Sir Sayyid's
attempt to interpret the Koran in terms of laws of nature, or
Western learning, did not involve innovation. It did. If men such as
Jamaluddin Afghani, the leading pan-Islamist of the nineteenth
century, ridiculed him as a nechari naturist-his efforts to
harmonize the laws of Islam with nature earned him this title), they
were justified. But his own intention was to strengthen the appeal
of Islam, to reveal to people the original bright face of Islam,
as he put it, and make it possible for young Muslims to imbibe
Western learning and yet remain Muslim.
His intentions apart, however, Sir
Sayyid did not have the capacity to impose his view of compatibility
between the Koranic revelation and miracles, on the one hand, and
modern science, on the other, on the Muhammadan Anglo- Oriental
Collage which developed into the Aligarh Muslim University. The
whole enterprise would have ended in smoke if he had not surrendered
control of theological education at Aligarh to Ali Baksh, one of his
bitterest critics on that issue.
|