They
did not raise the banner of Hindu Dharma as a universal tradition
itself but tried to be all things to all peoples, Christians to
Christians, Muslims to Muslims, even atheists to atheists. Even when
the teacher preserved the traditional and cultural roots of the
teachings, which did occur, their followers and political
interpreters often remade the teachings to accommodate all religious
beliefs, however hostile or contrary, so as to make the teacher more
popular.
Naturally such an effort could not
reinvigorate Hindu culture but had the reverse effect in making all
religions equal to encourage further neglect and diminution of the
cultural foundations of Hinduism. This
attitude went beyond mere tolerance of all religions or openness to
all people, which is of course necessary, to what was almost an
effort to court all religions by favor. Some teachers, though
relying on traditional Hindu teachings, did not want to be called
Hindu so as to appear modern, attractive to all, or a religion in
their own right.
Some claimed not only to honor and
respect but even to teach all religions, even if they had not
studied them in depth or in any traditional setting. They tried to
tell all religious groups that they were right and that their
religion, if they merely followed it faithfully, could lead them to
a spirituality comparable to Yoga teachings without having to
abandon their traditional beliefs. They tried to teach the esoteric
aspect of Hindu Dharma, Yoga and Vedanta, to members of all
religions, while leaving the cultural forms behind, as if such
practices could be grafted on to cultural or religious backgrounds
that provided neither the foundation nor the space for them to grow. |