This
river, lauded in the Vedas as the home of Vedic culture and
delineated in great detail, dried up after a series of geological
changes around 1900 BCE, marking the terminal point of the Harappan
culture. This relates Vedic culture to the earliest civilizations in
India well before the so-called Aryan invasion of 1500 BCE. After
more than a century of searching there has proved to be no real
evidence for any Aryan invasion of India, whether movements of
people, skeletal remains, destroyed cities, pottery types, burial
customs, or anything of the kind.
Yet rather than welcoming this new
information, and using it to examine traditional Hindu historical
accounts in a more equitable manner, many academicians are refusing
to draw any conclusions from it. Or they are trying to subvert it by
pretending that since there is no evidence of an Aryan invasion that
it must have occurred in a way that left no traces, that no evidence
for it is required because it is proved on another level! Some would
use linguistic speculation alone, without evidence or contrary to
the evidence, to promote this view. But modern linguistic
speculation cannot be substitute for or override firmer
archeological and literary data.
This is not to suggest that
academicians are operating out of intentional distortion, though
Marxist historians are well known to do this. They may be so
conditioned by a Eurocentric mindset, by an educational agenda to
promote Western culture and, perhaps, by a sincere belief that
Western culture is the best thing for all countries that it is hard
for them to accept any real greatness to the civilization of India. |