First of all, ahimsa does not simply mean nonviolence or not
resorting to arms. It means having an attitude that tries to reduce
harm to living creatures. Sometimes force or violence is necessary
to prevent or reduce harm. If a car is heading toward a child, we
may have to push the child forcefully out of the path of the vehicle
in order to save its life. If a wild animal is attacking people the
animal may have to be wounded or killed. Another possible
translation for ahimsa is non-aggression because all violence is not
necessarily avoidable for self-defense but can be avoided as an
aggressive policy.
However, modern Hindu leaders have not always applied the
principle of non-violence according to the tradition, perhaps
because they did not adequately examine traditional teachings. They
have simply stereotyped it as avoiding any violence, even that which
might save a life. Moreover they have used non-violence to appease
violent groups, responding to threats of violence by giving into the
demands of those who make them, which has not resulted in peace but
in the escalation of further demands.