EPILOGUE

The introductory part to Ayodhya is AGS No. 2 and Kutalamanikyam Temple in AGS No.5 can be cited for this in proof. Many others, why almost all drew reverent attention by the discerning readers. Secondly, to the charge of boosting my image by such fantastic accounts on gods or places, it is baseless. Is it not a fact that creative literature differs from the insipid reporting jargon? What all I wanted, and tried consciously also is to animate or enthuse the readers by sufficient warming up their beings. Nothing more nor less. It drew applause from many, and evoked dislike in a few too. Anyway, it is a way, and that is my style, characterised by luxuriant fancy, virulent expression and exuberant thought, remarking a critic friend ended that intensity is its distinguishing quality.

For one thing I have to bow to my readers unconditionally and invariably the commissions of every type - some are, of course, the printers' called the Printer's devils and many are mine can be termed as composer's ills, are permeating in all books. It is inexcusable. I confess that I did not do justice to my work, due to lack of time. And improper proof-reading too primarily. 

[ Back ] [ Up ] [ Next ]