INTRODUCTION
Who
is superior to whom-the Creator or the created? Which is mightier to what the
mover or the moved? Who deserves adoration first, the Primordial Being or His
product? This questionnaire may easily be posed, but can't be answered to the
total satisfaction of the sensory organs. Logical explanations and figurative
flourish may shut the mouth, only to throw open the doors of the mind to brood
over them endlessly, restlessly, timelessly, resulting in answerlessly, to speak
the truth. Hoary books-the repositories of the concentrated wisdom of Maharshis,
affirm with examples from the life of the august divine personage of no mean
distinction as Lord Maheswara that the Mover and moved-man and woman, Sivam and
Shakthi are equal, one does not exist independently of the other; their
interdependence and reciprocal regard should be upheld and implemented, as
exemplified by sharing of his half body to Mother Sati. It is mythologically
honourable, but practically impracticable in the society of the days then or
now. So it is rarely implemented, nay blatantly and deliberately derecognised, dishonored,
discarded, denigrated, desecrated and what not. Not by a negligible few, but a
percentage touching the centum with an usual quota of exceptions, perhaps. Does
this not mirror the impracticability of the truth expounded? Or embodying some
snag? Or likely a bias deliberately imposed upon? Male chauvanism is totally,
ruthlessly and openly holding this up to ridicule and subjugating woman to
untold hardships, or public humiliation to such an extent that neither the
ruling authority with military might, nor spiritual force of all the gods
supporting the reformers and pravaktas has done anything in this?
|