It
is not possible to remove violence when one is himself full of
violence. On the contrary, one only adds to the number of the
violent. But this was not realized at the time. The great men of
those days, men of non-violence, acted according to their lights.
Parashurama was a great exponent of non-violence, for that age. He
did not practice violence for the sake of violence. He did violence
in order to establish non-violence.
10. But that experiment
failed. Then came the age of Rama. Then the brahmins began to
think about it again. They had already given up violence; they had
resolved never to commit violence themselves. How then to escape the
attacks of rakshasas? They thought, "Here are these kshatriyas
who practice violence anyhow; why should not the rakshasas be
destroyed through them? One uses a thorn to remove a thorn. We shall
stand aside."
That is why, to protect his yajna,
sacrifice, Vishvamitra took Rama and Lakshmana and had the rakshasas
destroyed by them. Now we think, "The ahimsa that cannot
protect itself, that cannot stand to its own legs, this lame ahimsa,
how can it sustain itself?" But men like Vashishtha and
Vishvamitra saw nothing wrong in finding protection in the strength
of the kshatriyas. But what if there was no kshatriya
like Rama? |