It does not require much argument to show that the voters
are of various kinds of intellectual and moral calibre and that the representatives whom
they return are not always the best. That is inevitable in this imperfect
world. We also see that in some cases Law and Justice do not coincide. Our
courts are called Courts of Law.
They are not Courts of Justice in the
strict sense of that expression. Not unoften, our judges feel helpless
in the face of an unjust law, and, in their decisions, they recommend
that the law may be modified in consonance with the requirements of
justice.
The enactments of legislatures regulate public conduct.But what
about individual morality? What is the criterion of personal action, of what a man
should do by himself and for himself? In our religion it has been declared that in matters
of conduct one should be guided by the ordinances of the Vedas. Vedokhilo dharma
moolam: the Veda is the source of all Dharmas. The Vedas are authorless,
apaurusheya; they are not man-made. They are intuitions of yogic sages into eternal Truths.
Suppose a situation arises in which no guidance can be obtained from the Vedas.
Many of the Vedas have been lost. If the extant Vedic texts cannot guide us in our
conduct, it is prescribed that we should look for guidance to the writings of sages like
Manu, Yaajnavalkya, Paraasara and others who have left behind what may be called
aides
memoire or Smritis, which should determine our conduct. |