As against this, the progress of the Britishers in the study of Indian history was very fast. It may be that the hypothesis assumed by them to fix the chronology of ancient Indian history may not be correct. After all, they were foreigners. Their approach was not rooted in the culture of India. But the energies they applied to this work are praise worthy. They came for trade in the beginning of the seventeenth century. They decided to capture the political power of this land in the second quarter of the eighteenth century. By the first quarter of the nineteenth century they were masters of the whole of India. And by the end of the nineteenth century they had established the Aryan race theory and entire chronology of Indian history. What is the reason for the difference in this speed ?

In comparison with the Britishers, the only reason for slow Indian speed seems to be a lack of national consciousness, pleat and Organization. Before they reached India, the Britishers were a nation of organized patriots and disciplined and devoted individuals. Continuous were their efforts for such an organization from eleventh century onwards. They were able to pool the efforts of individuals who were applying their full capacities and energies to the cause. We know of James Princep who lived only for 39 years. He had devoted some hours everyday for seven years and in the end was successful in deciphering the Brahmi script. Many others like Jones, Pargiter, etc. were similarly active in the field. They had their family and service responsibilities. Inspite of this they were devoting so many man-hours everyday. They used to put down in writing their findings and researches on the basis of which they used to discuss in meetings in an organized way. These discussions and writings put in black and white were preserved. These writings are available today in the issues of the journals of Royal Asiatic Society, etc.. All this is worth not only appreciating but following also, Thanks to them for such an organized execution and preservation.

[ Back ] [ Bharateeya Historiography ] [ Up ] [ Next ]