Even
today many Hindus think that India's poverty or lack of social order
contributes to its spirituality and they use this idea to excuse the
poor state of the country or themselves not making any effort to
change it. These Hindus should make a serious examination of their
own history. Certainly Gandhi's loin cloth image contributes to
their view, but it is quite different than the image of traditional
Hindu kings and their royal affluence while at the same time
surrounded by sages and spiritual advisors, as in the case of King
Janaka.
The same people like to think in
terms of extremes, preferring India's poverty to Western
commercialism, or a passive Hinduism to aggressive Western
religions, not realizing that a Hindu affluence or military
self-sufficiency need not follow Western materialism, religious
exclusivism, or military aggression. It can be part of a more
wholesome spirituality that does not neglect the state of society,
which is the field that produces the individuals to follow the
spiritual life, as well as providing protection and support for
those who choose to do so.
A situation arose in time in which
the people of India, predominantly Hindu, would accept the rule of
foreigners or antagonistic religions with little resistance. They
were ready to accept an outside Kshatriya, and may have had to do
so, because they failed to produce a sufficient Kshatriya of their
own. Perhaps they eventually felt that an unjust or foreign rule was
better than no rule at all.
|