This discussion is certainly not meant to say that Mahatma Gandhi
is responsible for the current corruption in India. Gandhi had an
idealism and self-sacrifice that stands far above the opportunism of
Indian politicians today, and which quality of service needs to be
emulated again by everyone. Though he made mistakes, which even
great people can, he did much that was good, and never acted out of
selfishness or vindictiveness. His political non-violence is very
important and should be a first resort, but it cannot be made into
the whole of Kshatriya Dharma or of Hinduism.
We should remember that the Indian independence movement was well
under way before Gandhi and continued with the help of many other
leaders, who did not always agree with Gandhi on various points,
including his insistence on absolute non-violence. Tilak himself,
who led the movement before Gandhi, disagreed with him in this
regard.
Hindu Dharma is many-sided and flexible in its approach and
avoids any dogmatic absolutism, even about spiritual principles and
practices like ahimsa. While making spiritual principles absolute
can create a moral force that is appealing because of the simplicity
of its logic, it inevitably breeds distortion because life cannot be
reduced to black and white rules. It clouds people's thinking
because it reduces everything to a single issue and thereby prevents
any comprehensive examination.