Certainly he was an intellectual Kshatriya at least. We must also remember that Gandhi himself fought in the British army when he was young and in South Africa and was a recruiter for the British army and may have been reacting against his own past and the kind of false Kshatriya he saw among the British. However even if we grant that Gandhian non-violence was a useful policy for the times, it had negative ramifications beyond that period. This emphasis on absolute non-violence has weakened the Kshatriya Dharma in India and has created a situation in which many Hindus feel that it is against their religion to have any Kshatriya or warrior spirit at all. 

It caused Hindus to abandon the political field to people of different and often anti-Hindu sentiments. If a Dharmic Kshatriya is not created through the force of Brahma or spiritual knowledge, then the law is that an adharmic Kshatriya will come to fill in the vacuum. This is exactly what has occurred in modern India. After the excessive non-violence in the Indian independence movement no genuine Kshatriya could be created in the country. 

This left the country prey to a false Kshatriya, based mainly upon Marxist ideals, mixed with war lord temperaments, such as in other communist countries, who similarly have misled the people and prevented the real growth of the nation. This decline of a Kshatriya Dharma in India has weakened the character of the nation and resulted in a situation that would have horrified Gandhi himself. His own Congress party, which he wanted to dissolve once independence was achieved, has now become so riddled with corruption that it has nearly lost all credibility, not to mention integrity.

[ Back ] [ David Frawley ] [ Up ] [ Next ]