Why the Term Hindu
It is unbroken flow of national life,
earlier known as Bharat, became famous as Hindu in modem
times. Like the holy waters of the Ganga assuming different names
Bhagirathi, Jahnavi, Hoogly, etc. at different points and flows on
with innumerable streams joining it and enriching it, so also the
course of Hindu Rashtra symbolised one and the same life-stream even
while assuming different names and assimilating and getting enriched
by various currents and influences during its evolutionary process.
As such, calling it "Bharatiya" instead of Hindu
does not change its content or purport in the least. Therefore,
those who suggest this changes in the belief that they are
presenting a more liberal concept are under some serious illusion.
Also, giving up the term Hindu today being unable to face
the storm of malpropaganda would be tantamount to conceding
surrender before the erstwhile deceptive British policy which sought
to dub Hinduism as communalism and pervert its real connotation. It
would be a grave insult to Swami Vivekananda, Mahyogi Aurobindo and
Lokmanya Tilak who eulogised this nation as Hindu Nation in clear
and glowing terms. It will also push Mahatma Gandhi into the ranks
of communalists as he too had said in a challenging tone :
"Hinduism is a relentless
pursuit after Truth. And if today it has become moribund, inactive,
irresponsive to growth, it is because we are fatigued; and as soon
as the fatigue is over, Hinduism will burst forth upon the world
with a brilliance perhaps unknown before."
|