NOTES
1. Difference of opinion exists as to the name, authorship and time of
the author of the Artha Sastra. Hillebrandt in Uber Das Kautilya Sastra und
Verwandtes,
(Breslau 1908) has attempted to prove that Kautilya is not himself the sole author of the
Artha Sastra but that it belongs to a school of that name. Prof. Jacobi on the other hand
has successfully refuted the view of Hillebrandt in his article Uber die Echtheitdes
Kautilya in Sitzungsberichte des Koniglich Pressischen Akaddemi der Wissenschaften
(XXXIII. 1912. P. 832-849).
Prof. Winternitz, after an elaborate discussion, has assigned the Period
of Kautilya to the third century A.D. Prof. Jolly in his introduction to
Kautilya-Artha Sastra is inclined to ascribe a southern origin to the real author of the
book and thinks that Kautilya is a fabulous name. The excerpt runs thus: The
geographical horizon of the author, on the whole, points to a southern rather than a
northern home.
Thus in the discussion of trade-routes (VII. 12) the route to the south
is declared to be preferable because shells, diamonds, gems, pearls and gold are to be
found in abundance in the south, and in the chapter on the examination of gems (II, II)
South India and Ceylon occupy a prominent place. The only known MS of the
Artha Sastra exists in the South, and the frequent interchange of the two letters v and p in the same
MS is a Southern peculiarity.