No woman with a son or sons shall, after remarriage, be at liberty
to make free use of her own property; for that property of hers, her sons shall
receive.
If a woman after remarriage attempts to take possession of her
own property under the plea of maintaining her sons by her former husband, she shall be
made to endow it in their name. If a woman has many male children by many husbands, then
she shall conserve her property in the same condition as she had received it from her
husbands.
Even that property which has been given to her with full powers of
enjoyment and disposal, a remarried woman shall endow in the name of her sons .5
In Kautilya we first come across a reference to the personal property
of a married woman, which is termed Stridhanam over which she has full powers of enjoyment
and disposal ; this has been the subject of comment and criticism in the later digests on
law.
We, moreover, see that Kautilya gives us a picture of a society in
which asceticism had not gained firm root, though it was slowly establishing itself. The
birth of sons was also one of the important considerations of the society; so ho permit
remarriage of young widows having children or not.