Nandapandita, after explaining the first part of the verse, explains Iti
thus: - As indicated by the word Iti, property received during the bridal procession,
and property obtained by inheritance, purchase, partition, acceptance, finding, as
maintenance in the shape of ornaments of gifts, etc., has also to be included. All these
species of property together should be known to be Stridhana.' 52
Visvesvara, one of the commentators on the Mitakshara, quotes the text
of Yajnavalkya on Stridhana, and says: ' The word Adya refers to property acquired
by spinning (Kartana), purchase, partition, seizure, finding a treasure, and other modes
of acquisition.' Here the use of the word Kartana instead of Rikta is probably
indicative of the difference of opinion.
The greatest support to Vijnanesvara's theory comes from the commentary
of Apararka. The reading of Apararka agrees with that of Yajnavalkya. His reading contains
"chaiva", as in Yajnavalkya, the meaning of which was a bone
of contention among
the commentators; for Jimutavahana restricts the scope of Stridhana, by an
interpretation of this word. Apararka elucidates chaiva thus: -
'The particle Cha has the same meaning as Adi, etc. Therefore it can
cover the other species of Stridhana mentioned in the following text:
" The wives shall obtain an equal share; 53 the mother also shall
receive an equal share,54 the fourth part of their own share;55 let the daughters divide
the nuptial present of their mother.56 This and whatever else may become the property of a
woman is denominated as woman's property by Manu and other ancient sages" '.
57
We thus find Apararka coming to the same conclusion, though he bases
his reasoning on a different text. The Mayukha divides Stridhana into two distinct
classes: the Saudayika and the property other than Saudayika. The former is under the full
control of the wife; but the immovable property is subject to her
husband's control
in his life-time. The Mayukha restricts her power over the property termed
Adhivedanikadyam.