This
is also to be expected because the Brahmins represent the spiritual
and religious view that is antagonistic to their materialistic
ideology, and represent the class system that they feel is
obstructing their way to a classless society (which they have never
achieved anywhere, we might add). Communists in India vilify the Brahmins like those in Europe did
the bourgeoisie, even though these two classes have little in
common.
Communists have portrayed the Brahmins as rich landowners
and the untouchables as their servants, like the Russian nobility
and their peasant serfs, while the Brahmins are really among the
poorer classes of the country. This communist vision of the cruel
Brahmins is a distortion, to say the least. To the extent that corrupt Brahmins have existed, which has been
highly exaggerated, they were guilty of not following the Dharma of
their class. It was not their Brahminism that was the problem but
their assumption of non-Brahminical activities.
To blame the
so-called caste systems for such deviations from it is indeed
ironic. If such cruel Brahmins did exist they were not true Brahmins
at all. Yet we are led to believe that the typical Brahmin class was
an institution for worldly power that only used the appearance of
spirituality to dominate others for worldly gain.Like
communism in other countries Indian socialism has not succeeded in
raising the masses but only in creating a stifling bureaucracy, and
skillful political exploiters who rule by the communalism of
vote-banks, stoked by anti-Brahmin sentiments. Such bureaucratic
leaders are the real corrupt ruling elite that should be removed
from power. |