Brahmins
are also different from the monks and swamis in Hinduism, who as
part of their renunciation must give up their identification with
class, including that of a Brahmin. Hindus look up to these swamis
and sadhus as their true spiritual leaders, not simply to Brahmins,
who serve a more outer ritualistic role. Brahmins function more as
outer religious functionaries than as inner illuminates.
To compare Brahmins to Catholic priests is inappropriate, as is
to cast the European distrust of Christian priests and preachers
upon them. The second is the
Western democratic dislike of the "higher classes," like
the European aristocracy in the days of kings. Brahmins, however,
were never higher classes in the Western sense, like the rich
aristocrats as in eighteenth century Europe. As already noted they
have been neither princes nor the wealthy who live in luxury.
They were seldom landowners who ruled
by force but rather teachers, scholars and priests wedded to
poverty, simplicity and learning. Meanwhile the wealthy classes in
India, whom the Western media would assume are Brahmins, are more
likely to be Shudras, members of the old servant class, many of whom
are now wealthy, particularly in South India (Andhra Pradesh and
Tamil Nadu), or Vaishyas, the business class, as in Gujarat and
Rajasthan. |