It
may be that some religions have misinterpreted what was a more yogic
teaching by their founders. Others may faithfully represent what the
founders of their religions intended, even if there is no real
spirituality or mysticism in it. Others may have a mysticism but
different than that of Hinduism. But Hindus must allow members of
other religions to speak for themselves, define themselves and be
who they are, which may not reflect the teachings and practices of
Hinduism.
If members of other religions do not find Hinduism or Vedanta in
their religions, it may not be because they haven't understood their
religions but because such teachings have little place within their
traditions. If they do find Vedanta in their religion let them say
so. A Hindu shouldn't have to speak for them in this regard. To
tell other people that they have misunderstood their own traditions,
and that such traditions originally reflected a Hindu-like
spirituality, is not tolerance but intolerance.
It refuses to accept that there can
be any other model of religion than the Vedantic, that if someone
has another view of religion it is only because they have
misunderstood their own tradition. True tolerance consists of
allowing people to have their own beliefs and practices, regardless
of whether we accept them or not, or whether they are similar to
what we do or not. Superimposing a Hindu view of other religions
upon them is not tolerating, or even understanding them. It may be
based on an intent to spiritualize other religions but it is not
looking at what they really are and so can only lead to confusion. |