As
Rizvi notes: "Although Mustafa Kemal (Ataturk) had abolished
the Ottoman sultanate in 1922 and the last Ottoman caliphate two
years later, the mystical hope of reviving the caliphate never died
in India, particularly in Deoband." Of course it is well known
that the Indian Independence movement, with Hindu support, agitated
in the early twenties for the restoration of the Caliphate in order
to draw the Muslims into the independence movement.
This led to the great disaster of
Moplah massacre of over ten thousand Hindus in Kerala, not to any
Muslim-Hindu unity. Maulana Azad, who worked for the independence of
India, was also a follower of Sirhindi and opposed the ideas of
Akbar. In fact most Sufis in India today appear to be of the
Sirhindi-Waliullah line of thought. The great majority of Sufis
promoted the partition of India and the continued Islamization of
the subcontinent.
Sufis continue to be active in
Pakistan and Bangladesh, where Hindus are routinely oppressed, and
encourage the complete Islamization of these cultures, eradicating
any Hindu vestiges in the lives of the people. Sufis are active in
India upholding Islamic separatism and making sure Muslims do not
get assimilated into Indian society. While many Sufis, particularly
certain Chishtis, did criticize intolerant Sufis like Sirhindi and
later Waliullah on a doctrinal level, they did little to really
oppose them. |