It is true that jnana reduces
to ashes the grosser imperfections of the heart, but the
subtle impurities it cannot destroy. Self-reliance, reason, discrimination, discipline,
detachment - even if you employ all these, the subtle impurities cannot
be removed. Only the waters of bhakti have the power to cleanse them. If you like, you can call, this
"para-avalambana," dependence of para, but this para does not mean
"another" but "the Supreme." Except with the help of the Lord, we cannot get rid of our impurities.
12. Some may say that we are here giving a narrow meaning to the word "jnana," that if jnana cannot cleanse
the mind, its value is reduced. I accept this objection, but what I say is that as long as we are in this physical
body, our knowledge, however pure it is, will have some impurity, some distortion, some
imperfection - its power will be limited. When pure jnana rises, I have not the slightest doubt that it
will destroy every impurity, along with the mind. But in this troubled
and passionate flesh its power is reduced, and it cannot remove the subtler impurities.
This is why bhakti is necessary. Hence I say that in bhakti man is better protected. Saguna
bhakti is easy. It relies on the Supreme, while nirguna bhakti trusts in oneself. But what is the self that one
trusts? It is reliance on the Supreme that dwells within oneself. There is no man who attained purity
with the help of the mind alone Through self-reliance, that is,
through realization of the Self within, pure knowledge is attained. In other
words, even in the self-reliance of nirguna bhakti, the ground is the
atman, the self.
|