The true way of freeing oneself
from activity
7. Now the question is, "If
there is defect in all actions, then why should we not give them up
all?" The answer to this has already been given once. The
concept of giving up all actions is very beautiful. The thought of
it fascinates one. But how is one to give up these countless
actions? Will the method of giving up rajasik and tamasik
actions serve for saattvik actions too?
How to save oneself from those sattvik
actions that are defective? This would be like 'sendraaya
taakshakaaya svaahaa,' 'offering an oblation of Takshaka
with Indra.' The funny thing is that when a man does this, not only
does Indra, the immortal, not die, but Takshaka, the mortal,
escapes death and grows stronger. In saattvik action there is
merit, but a little defect. But if, because there is some evil mixed
up with the good, you would offer up, renounce the good along with
the evil, not only will the good, because of its strength, not
perish, but evil will certainly go on increasing.
By this foolish kind to mixed
sacrifice, the Indra of merit does not indeed perish, but the Takshaka
of evil, though mortal will escape death. How then are we to
renounce them? If we drive away the cat because it is a nuisance,
the nuisance of the mice will increase. If we destroy the snakes
because they do harm, other creatures multiply and destroy the crops
and, as a result, thousands of people may die. Therefore,
renunciation must be accompanied with discrimination.
|