In fact
the question arises: can a major Hindu politician arise who does not
feel it necessary to bow down before Christianity and Islam in order
to prove that he is a true national leader? Cannot a Hindu be a
national leader of India as a good Hindu without having to try to be
a good Christian and Muslim as well?
Being a good national leader is not a
matter of respecting one or all religious beliefs. It consists of
giving priority to the nation at a political level, regardless of
religious considerations. In India today nationalism is not defined
by nationalism but by religion, and particularly by honoring
foreign-derived religions, as if that somehow made one more
nationalistic! Naturally this
makes for a weak country and encourages separatist movements.
As soon as a Hindu politician in
India wants to become popular, he starts speaking of the glory of
Islam and the greatness of Christ. He does not speak of the
greatness of the nation going back to ancient times or of its
venerable old Hindu-based traditions. This does not encourage
minority groups to think of themselves as Indians but gives more
weight to their religious identity as overriding any political
identity. For India to move forward this practice must come to an
end. A Hindu politician need bow down to Muslim and Christian
religious interests and avoid appearing too Hindu. He must be a
national leader who promotes the welfare of the country as a whole
over the special interests of any group, while both remaining true
to his own religious background and allowing others the freedom to
follow their own. |