Vasishtha accepts the thesis of Baudhayana that women
possess an unrivalled means of purification (XXVIII, 4), and that
women are free from stains, as they haw; a divine gift from Soma,
Gandharva and Fire.145
A noticeable change was gradually taking place in the society of this
period in the position of an only daughter and in her rights of
inheritance. In the Vedic period an only daughter was installed by her
father in the place of a son, and she consequently belonged to her
father’s family, though we do no, know if she was designated by any
special mime.
In the Smriti literature, however, there is a special
name for such a daughter-Putrika and the synonym putra is added to it
to indicate this special kind of adoption. This original significance
of the word has been recorded by the author of the Mitakshara,146
who explains the term Putrika - Putra as ‘Putrika, considered as a
son.’ In the Smritis, the earliest law-giver, Gautama, gives her a
place next to that of a legitimate son, As regards inheritance he
says,147
‘Sapindas, Sagotras and the wife shall share the estate of a person
deceased without male issue or an appointed daughter," and quotes
a verse in Support of the above.148
‘A father who has no male issue may appoint his
daughter to raise up a son for him, presenting burnt offerings to Agni
(fire) and to Prajapati the lord of creatures and addressing the
bridegroom with these words, "For me be thy male offspring."
Some declare that the daughter becomes an appointed daughter, solely
by the intention of the father.’
In the above, if the addition of the translators,
which was evidently made to bring about a consistent sense, is put
aside, and if the text alone is taken into consideration, then it
unmistakably points to the Vedic custom of installing an only daughter
in the, position of a son and of giving her the right to perform
funeral oblations, which a father could do by the mere expression of
his wish and by saying to her, Be thou my son.’