In the former, white dealing with the length of a
staff to be carried by a student, further details are not given but
the simple statement, ‘the details have been given above’; and, as
nothing further appears in the Dharma-Sutra in that connection, it has
to be concluded that he refers to the Grhya ritual, where the
necessary injunctions as to the tree from which the staff has to be
cut and the rest are given.
In the second passage Baudhayana, while speaking of
the rules for the funeral sacrifices says: ‘The remaining rules have
been prescribed (in the section) on the burnt oblation on the Ashtaka
(days).25 The details of the homa appear in
his Grhya Sutra, 26 and hence it is clear
that his Dharma Sutra was a continuation of the Grhya-Sutra and
presupposed it. The Kalpa-Sutra of Baudhayana, as has been
pointed out by scholars, has not come down in its original shape to
posterity : portions of it have been destroyed, which necessitated
addition and alteration by later compilers.
The Grhya-Sutra of Baudhayana 27
bears evidence of the hands of later writers. The first three Prasnas
have been considered to be the genuine composition of Baudhayana. The
same can be said of the Dharma Sutra. The fourth Prasna has been
proved by scholars to be a later addition. The following argument has
been adduced in favour of this hypothesis: ‘it consists of two
parts. The first, which ends with the fourth Adhyaya, treats of
penances, both public and secret ones.
The second, Adhyayas five to eight, describes the
means of obtaining Siddhi, the fulfilment of one’s desires, and
recommends for this purpose the offering of the Ganahomas after a
previous sanctification of the worshipper by means of a course of
austerities. The first part is thoroughly superfluous, as the subject
of penances has already been discussed in the first sections of the
second Prasna and again in chapters four to ten of the third Prasna.
Its rules sometimes contradict those given previously, and in other
Cases, 28 are mere repetitions of previous
statements.