121. The representative (the son begotten on the
wife) is not invested with the right of the principal (the eldest brother to an additional
share); the principal (became) a father on the procreation (of a son by his younger
brother); hence one should give a share to the (son be-gotten on the wife of the
elder brother) according to the rule (stated above).
122. If there be a doubt, how
the division shall be made, in case the younger son is born of the elder wife and
the elder son of the younger wife,
123. (Then the son) born of the first wife shall
take as his additional share one (most excellent) bull; the next best bulls (shall
belong) to those (who are) inferior on account of their mothers.
124. But the eldest
(son, being) born of the eldest wife, shall receive fifteen cows and a bull, the other sons may then take shares according to (the seniority of) their mothers; that is a settled rule.
125. Between sons born of wives equal (in caste) (and) without (any
other) distinction no seniority in right of the mother exists; seniority is declared (to
be) according to birth.
126. And with respect to the Subrahmanya (texts) also it is
recorded that the invocation (of Indra shall be made) by the first-born, of twins
likewise, (conceived at one time) in the wombs (of their mothers) the seniority is
declared (to depend) on (actual) birth.
127. He who has no son may make his
daughter in the following manner an appointed daughter (putrika, saying to her
husband), 'The (male) child, born of her, shall perform my funeral rites.'
128.
According to this rule Daksha, himself, lord of created beings, formerly made (all
his female offspring) appointed daughters in order to multiply his race.
129. He gave
ten to Dharma, thirteen to Kasyapa, twenty-seven to King Soma, honouring
(them) with an affectionate heart.
130. A son is even (as) oneself, (such) a daughter
is equal to a son; how can another (heir) take the estate, while such (an appointed
daughter who is even) oneself, lives?
|